TryNoBot vs Fraud Blocker
Fraud Blocker is a well-reviewed click-fraud tool aimed squarely at small businesses and agencies running Google Ads, with a clean dashboard and a genuine Google Ads integration. TryNoBot overlaps with it on detection and goes further on the technical side — TLS fingerprinting, server-side enforcement and explainable scores — while including considerably more volume and more sites at the entry price.
Fraud Blocker is the better buy if your whole problem is one Google Ads account and you want IP exclusions handled for you today. TryNoBot is the better buy if you manage several sites, need to stop non-JavaScript automation, or want to see why a visitor was scored the way it was.
TryNoBot and Fraud Blocker, feature by feature
Rows marked with a dot are the material differences. Everything in the right-hand column is taken from their own published pages.
| TryNoBot | Fraud Blocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $69/month billed monthly, or $690/year — annual is an option, never a requirement | $79/month list, lower on annual billing |
| Included volume | 10,000 ad clicks/month | 5,000 ad clicks at the entry tier |
| Websites | 10 websites | 1 at the entry tier |
| Metering unit | Ad clicks | Ad clicks — directly comparable |
| TLS fingerprinting | JA3 + JA4 TLS fingerprinting on every request | Not published on their pricing or features pages |
| Search-engine safety | Verified search crawlers are identified by reverse DNS, not user-agent, and always receive the same page as a human visitor | Not published on their pricing or features pages |
| Server-side enforcement | Server-side Shield — PHP, Django, Node, nginx, Cloudflare Workers | Not published on their pricing or features pages |
| Shared threat network | Cross-customer bot memory, matched on fingerprint cardinality | Not published on their pricing or features pages |
| Score transparency | 0–100 score with the exact signals that produced it | A fraud score is shown; the contributing signals are not published |
| Google Ads IP exclusions | On the roadmap — not shipped yet | Automatic IP exclusion push to Google Ads |
| Decision latency | Under 10ms decision latency | Not published on their pricing or features pages |
| Trial | 7-day trial, no credit card | 7-day free trial |
Fraud Blocker figures read from their own pricing and feature pages on 21 September 2026. Introductory offers and annual rates may differ — check theirs before deciding. Where a row reads "not published", that means we could not find it stated publicly, not that the product lacks it.
Where TryNoBot is stronger
- Ten sites against their single-site entry tier, at a lower monthly price
- Twice the ad-click allowance, metered the same way, so the comparison is direct
- TLS-level detection (JA3/JA4) that does not depend on the visitor running your JavaScript
- Server-side Shield for PHP, Django, Node, nginx and Cloudflare Workers
- Shared bot memory across all customers, matched on fingerprint cardinality rather than a single sighting
Where Fraud Blocker is stronger
- A shipped Google Ads integration that writes exclusions back to your account — the single biggest thing TryNoBot is still missing
- A long record of positive small-business and agency reviews
- Thousands of domains on the platform, which is the kind of proof a new product cannot manufacture
- A simpler product with less to learn if all you want is one-account protection
TryNoBot vs Fraud Blocker: common questions
Which is better for an agency?
If the agency wants hands-off Google Ads exclusion management, Fraud Blocker today. If it manages many client sites and wants one bill, ten sites on TryNoBot's entry tier is a materially different proposition from one.
Do both meter ad clicks the same way?
Yes. Both meter paid ad clicks at the entry tier, so 10,000 against 5,000 is a like-for-like comparison — unlike ClickCease, which meters all site visits.
What does TryNoBot catch that a JavaScript tag cannot?
Anything that never runs the tag: scripted HTTP clients, scrapers, and automation hitting your pages or endpoints directly. The server-side Shield scores those before your page renders.
Other comparisons
Try it on your own traffic for 7 days
No credit card. See what's actually hitting your landing pages, then decide.